@@@
People following the聽Marathon bombing trial have been relying on聽drawings of courtroom [url=http://www.chocolaterie-dousset.com/log/maillot_psg_2012_rouge_050305.html]maillot psg 2012 rouge[/url]
artists聽and descriptions from reporters, as well as on Twitter. 聽It was a similar situation during the Whitey Bulger trial. 聽Both [url=http://vaninyhandbag.com/private/camiseta_real_madrid_baloncesto_2014_241223.html]camiseta real madrid baloncesto 2014[/url]
cases were tried in federal court, which meant no cameras in the courtroom.
Those who favor a ban in federal court point to聽protecting the privacy of witnesses and jurors to safeguarding the integrity of the judicial system.
They say cameras turn cases into [url=http://www.chocolaterie-dousset.com/private/maillot_de_lyon_532302.html]maillot de lyon[/url]
spectacles, such as the 1995聽O.J. Simpson trial for the murders ex-wife Nicole Brown Simpson and her friend, Ronald Goldman, which turned lawyers, witnesses and the presiding judge into [url=http://www.yannicklabbe-aupaveduroi.com/img/england_rugby_jersey_in_malaysia_122235.html]england rugby jersey in malaysia[/url]
TV and tabloid celebrities.
Others argue it is a聽critical civic function by allowing the public to view trials that are often being prosecuted in their name by the [url=http://coilover-store.com/images/que_significa_aon_en_la_camiseta_del_manchester_united_250531.html]que significa aon en la camiseta del manchester united[/url]
government.
Supporters also point out that states have allowed [url=http://jooltool.com/images/replica_camiseta_seleccion_española_2014_125522.html]replica camiseta seleccion espa?ola 2014[/url]
cameras in courtrooms for years, and that federal courts are lagging.
What do you think? 聽Should cameras be allowed inside federal courtrooms?
Leave your comments below, or on or using #WBZTalker.
|
|
業務連絡